2012 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences awarded for grunt work


The Nobel Prize in Economics has been  in a free fall to mediocrity for several years. The 2012 awards to Alvin E. Roth and Lloyd Shapley for their work in market design and matching theory essentially completes the process of  intellectual disintegration for a Prize that once was highly regarded for high quality contributions to economic sciences. The Prize, quite frankly, is now all but worthless in terms of prestige, though not, even with its 20 per cent reduction in value, in terms of krona. Paul Samuelson, Friedrich von Hayek, Milton Friedman, James M. Buchanan, Ronald Coase, et al are inevitably diminished when midgets replace giants in the Alfred Nobel Hall of Fame.

Following the ludicrous award of the Peace Prize to the European Union  last week,  Nobel Committees across Scandinavia would do well to close their doors in order to maintain credibility for earlier winners whose work truly honored the standards set by Alfred Nobel.

The contributions of Roth and Shapley represent grunt work that can easily be provided by computer novices.  In environments where markets do not – or are not allowed – to function an infinite number of matching solutions vie for attention. Pick your preferred outcome and program the computer to deliver it.  Then sit back, hope that the Committee shares your prejudices, and wait for the 3 am call from Sweden!

Tags: , , , ,

4 Responses to “2012 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences awarded for grunt work”

  1. Jason Says:

    Professor, I wonder if you have in mind a short list of economists who, if awarded future prizes, would reassure your confidence in the prize itself?

  2. charlesrowley Says:

    Jason:

    That is a good and fair question. At short notice I shall not attempt to provide a full list. But the following are unambiguous examples:

    Gordon Tullock (contributions to economics, public choice and law-and-economics)

    Anthony Barnes Atkinson: contributions to public economics, taxation and income inequality

    William Jack Baumol: contributions to welfare economics, contestable markets, entrepreneurship

    Anne Krueger; contributions to international trade, rent-seeking analysis.

    Mark Blaug: contributions to history of economic thought.

    Jagdish Bhagwati: contributions to international trade.

    Richard Musgrave: contributions to public finance’
    .

    Sam Peltzman: contributions to economic theory of regulation’
    .

    Charles Plott: contributions to experimental economics.

    Kenneth Rogoff: contributions to theories of financial crises.

    Harvey Rosen: contributions to public finance.

    John Taylor: contributions to monetary theory and policy.

    Kip Viscusi: contributions to risk assessment.

    Robert Willig: contributions to industrial organization.

    Each of these has made a significant innovative contribution (some more trhan one) to economics, a decisive break-through in the sense required by Alfred Nobel in his original bequest.

    Gordon Tullock towers over the list and it is a standing disgrace that the Nobel Committee will not recognize his genius.

  3. Stephen Karlson Says:

    Armen Alchian and Harold Demsetz, for thinking about how creatively people can respond to constraints.

  4. charlesrowley Says:

    Stephen:

    Your suggestion is excellent. I had not realized that Richard Musgrave is dead. So in my follow-up list of 11 Giants I have replaced Musgrave with Alchian, following on your suggestion.

Leave a comment